AI-Powered AP Automation Built for Indian Finance Teams
AI invoice capture, GST and TDS checks, 7-way matching and clear exception queues, then posting to your ERP. Configured to your process, not the other way round.
- 45-day pilot on one entity
- ERP-agnostic integration
- GSTIN and tax checks before posting
What AP Automation (APIQ) is
APIQ is the AI-powered accounts payable workspace of Cresolv One. Invoices come in, are read by AI, are checked against what you ordered and received, and either move on to approval or land in a queue with a clear reason. Approved invoices are prepared for your ERP, and the status of each posting comes back into the same screen.
The aim is not to remove your AP team. It is to stop them doing the work a system can do, such as keying fields, hunting for a PO or chasing a goods receipt, so their time goes to the invoices that genuinely need judgement.
It is built around Indian finance realities: GSTIN checks across registrations, GST-ITC, TDS, e-invoicing, MSME payment timelines and approval chains that follow your delegation of authority.
Why accounts payable stays manual
Most AP delays are not about typing speed. They come from invoices that cannot be matched: the PO is missing, the goods receipt is not posted, the vendor is not in the master, or the GST registration on the bill is the wrong one. Each one sends someone into email and spreadsheets to find the reason.
Without a shared view, nobody knows how many invoices are stuck, why, or for how long. Late payments, missed early-payment discounts, MSME timeline risk and blocked input tax credit are the usual result.
How an invoice moves through APIQ
- Receive: invoices arrive by email, vendor portal or EDI and are captured automatically.
- Read: AI extracts vendor, amounts, line items, tax and PO reference, and flags low-confidence fields.
- Match: seven checks run against PO, goods receipt, vendor master and tax data.
- Route: clean invoices go to approval, and exceptions go to a named queue with the reason.
- Approve and post: approvals follow your rules, and approved invoices are prepared for your ERP.
Every step is recorded, so anyone can open an invoice and see what happened to it and who decided.
Seven-way matching, in plain terms
A standard three-way match compares the purchase order, the goods receipt and the invoice. APIQ keeps those checks and adds the ones Indian groups need, so every invoice is matched on seven points before approval:
- Ordering GSTIN: the registration that placed the order.
- Vendor GSTIN: the registration the vendor actually invoiced under.
- PO GSTIN: the registration the purchase order was raised against. These three must align, so a bill raised against the wrong registration is caught before approval.
- GRN quantity: what the warehouse actually received.
- Rate: the invoiced rate against the rate on the purchase order.
- Quantity: the invoiced quantity against the purchase order.
- Tax verification: a check that the GST treatment is correct for the transaction.
Tolerances are yours to set. A small rate difference can pass automatically while a large one is routed for review. The rule and the reason are shown with every exception, so the reviewer does not have to rediscover the problem.
Want to see matching run on your own invoices?Share a sample batch and we will walk the matches and exceptions with you.
Request a Demo
One workspace for every kind of invoice
Different invoices need different handling, so APIQ keeps them in separate streams inside one workspace.
| Stream | What it covers | How it behaves |
|---|
| PO-based invoices | Domestic, import, logistics, materials and services invoices raised against a purchase order | Matched on PO, vendor, rate and tax, with verification filters. Material invoices add goods receipt and warehouse checks, and import invoices have their own queues and exception handling |
| Non-PO invoices | Services and manpower invoices, and other costs with no purchase order | Upload, functional and cost-centre approval, AP verification, TDS deduction, then accounting to the right GL and cost centre |
In the non-PO stream, approval follows the functional owner of the cost centre, so the person who owns the spend approves it. TDS is deducted as part of processing, and each posting carries the GL account and cost centre.
The queue names, filters and approval levels shown in any demo are configurable. We set them up to match your policy and the way your team already works.
Exception queues that tell you what to fix
A flat inbox of problem invoices is hard to manage. APIQ sorts them by reason, so the right person sees the right work.
- PO not found, vendor not found or business unit not found, which usually point to master data gaps.
- GRN pending, where goods have not yet been received in the warehouse system.
- Duplicate invoice, where the same bill has arrived twice.
- QC rework and reject loops, for invoices sent back to the vendor or an earlier step.
- Treasury planning, for invoices cleared and waiting for a payment run.
- Posting failures, flagged in colour so a failed ERP post is never lost.
Each row carries its age in days, so the oldest problems rise to the top. Search by invoice number, document ID or PO, filter by any column, and export to Excel when someone needs a list.
Curious how many of your invoices would clear first time?A pilot answers it on your own data.
Scope a Pilot
Visibility for the head of finance
The statistics view turns the queues into numbers a controller can use: invoice status by stage, month-wise movement between inward, exception and booked, payables grouped by age, and material-mapping outcomes. Every chart can be downloaded as an image or as CSV.
The interface is available in several languages, and counters at the top show pending, active and delayed work at a glance.
Where AI helps, and where rules decide
AI reads documents and flags what looks wrong. Rules decide what gets posted.
- Capture: AI extracts fields from PDFs, scans and XML, with up to 95% accuracy on clean documents.
- Flagging: low-confidence fields and unusual values are sent for a human look.
- Rules: matching, tolerances, tax checks and approvals are explicit rules you can read and change.
That split keeps results explainable. A finance head or auditor can always see why an invoice was approved or held.
Measuring the return on AP automation
The return on AP automation is rarely one number. It shows up in several places, and a fair business case measures each against your own baseline instead of a vendor average. These are the ones we suggest you track before and after a pilot:
- Touches per invoice. How many people handle an invoice before it is approved, and how many times it is re-keyed or forwarded.
- Days from receipt to approval. Measured separately for PO, non-PO and material invoices, because they behave differently.
- Cost per invoice. Team time spent on capture, matching and chasing, divided by invoices processed.
- Early-payment discounts missed. Invoices that could have earned a discount but were approved too late.
- Payment-timeline exposure. Invoices to MSME vendors approaching the statutory payment window.
- Input tax credit at risk. Invoices held back or blocked because of GSTIN or e-invoice mismatches.
The 45-day pilot starts by capturing this baseline on one entity, so the result is your own figure and not an estimate. If you want a first estimate before you talk to us, the ROI calculator takes about two minutes and uses your own invoice volumes.
Who it is for
APIQ suits teams that match invoices to purchase orders and goods receipts and that carry GST and TDS obligations.
| Team | Typical pressure |
|---|
| Manufacturers and distributors | High PO-backed volume with goods receipts to match |
| Multi-GSTIN groups | Bills raised against the wrong registration, blocked ITC |
| Retail and consumer brands | Many vendors, many plants, many exceptions |
| Shared service centres | Approval chains and SLA tracking across entities |
If your invoice volume is low enough that a spreadsheet still works, it is probably too early. We will say so.
ERP-agnostic by design
APIQ works with the ERP you already run. It connects to SAP, Oracle, Microsoft Dynamics, Tally, Zoho and other systems through API or file-based integration, agreed per client during scoping. Vendor master and PO data flow in, and posting status flows back, including failures.
You do not replace your ERP, and you do not retrain your accounts team on a new ledger.
Deployment and security
Deployment is agreed per client need, in the hosting model that suits your policy. Access is role-based, every approval is recorded, and the trail is ready for internal and statutory audit.
A 45-day pilot on one entity
We do not ask you to rebuild anything. A pilot runs for about 45 days on one entity or one invoice stream. You share a batch of invoices with matching PO and goods-receipt data. We configure the checks and queues, and you compare the results with how your team handles the same invoices today.
Results from pilots are indicative of what your own data will show, and we do not quote outcome figures before testing on your invoices.